Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘APR’

Meeting

At MYC4, the loan products are at the core of our engagements with both new and existing providers. One key reason that products are critical on the MYC4 platform, is that they spell out how revenue generated from each loan is to be distributed. A provider must be satisfied that the revenue offered through the product is sufficient to make business sense to the institution; while at the same time offering decent returns to the investors/ lenders; and still provide competitively fair priced capital to the borrower. The products also define eligibility criteria, risk assessment methodology and other features.

Agreeing on the product pricing is usually a bargaining process that has several give and takes. Three factors that slightly complicate product pricing are:

  1. Most Microfinance Institutions price their loans on flat rate basis, while on MYC4 the loans are priced on reducing balance basis. There is also a slight twist on the reducing balance computation, in that MYC4 utilises effective interest rate (compounding effect), while the industry standard on reducing balance computation utilizes simple/ nominal interest. The effect of this is that the interest rate and APR appear higher on MYC4. We are in process of harmonizing the computation methodology.
  2. The concept of APR is not well entrenched in the financial system in Africa; yet APR is crucial in ensuring transparency in lending. It is not unusual to find that top management of an MFI have limited or no idea about APR. It is thus a task to agree on the appropriate APR, given that MFIs mostly focus on the interest element of pricing.
  3. Generally speaking, the higher the loan amounts the lower the interest rate should be. This is because the cost per unit is lower on the larger loans (the assumption being that the same effort is used to produce a large as is used on a small loan). However, on MYC4, the larger loans need to offer higher returns to investors in order to attract sufficient capital – thus the larger loans will have higher interest rates. The providers are thus forced to forego part of their mark-up on the larger loans in order to offer fair priced capital to borrowers.

So what exactly is a product? According to Phillip Kotler (a marketing guru), all firms are in the business of satisfying customer needs, and they do this through a product. He defines a product as “anything that can be offered to satisfy a need or want”. Thus we can say that in the financial sector, a product is any offering or proposed solution that has distinct characteristics.

The essential characteristics of a loan product are highlighted here below. The product features on MYC4 are essentially developed by the providers, with MYC4 largely providing an advisory role.

  1. Loan amount range: This is essential as different loan products are targeted at different market segments from micro enterprises to small and medium enterprises. The trend on MYC4 is that lower loan amount ranges fund at lower interest rates, because they are easily fully funded by auto-bids from the more socially inclined investors. Larger loans, on the other hand, require crowd-pooling of more investors per loan, and often attract the more commercially oriented investors.
  2. Pricing: The pricing component has two elements; the upfront fees (referred to as closing fees on MYC4) and interest (referred to as repayment fees on MYC4). The upfront fees are spread over the duration of the loan so as to arrive at one comparative annual percentage figure, the APR. The total cost of loan to the borrower is the sum of interest income due to investors, MYC4 and the provider mark-up.
  3. Loan repayment period: We have flexible and fair repayment terms on MYC4. We recognize that revenue generation patterns may differ; we thus allow a grace period where necessary, and have repayment periods of upto 36 months.
  4. Loan terms and conditions: Different loan products have set eligibility criteria, risk assessment criteria, collateral requirements among others. On MYC4, the bidding period is also an essential feature (large loans generally require more days to fundraise).
  5. Other features such as insurance and forced savings: Most loans on MYC4 are insured against death and permanent disability of the key person (thus shielding the deceased estate from legal tussles to recover borrowed fund). Most MFIs that offer group lending require borrowers to save a certain portion so as to access funds (this forced savings add to the cost of borrowing, thus a loan with forced savings has a higher APR).

All in all the loans on MYC4 are priced such that the total cost is the same as what the borrowers were paying on the MFIs other loans, or less; but never higher. MYC4 never seeks to cannibalize the market or the provider’s other products; but through use of APR and transparent pricing aims at engaging providers towards lower costs to borrowers. In certain markets, borrowers prefer waiting for longer to receive a MYC4 loan than receive an instant loan from the provider’s other products: the attraction being lower interest rate and reducing balance methodology (which means they only pay interest for the period the loan was outstanding).

Read Full Post »

Confessions of a Microfinance Heretic

Confessions of a Microfinance Heretic

By retelling his experiences working in the microfinance field, Hugh Sinclair tells the story of a sector that – he believes – has become corrupt and focused on profit. However, he does believe in the potential of microfinance and sees the light at the end of the tunnel by offering a number of concrete advice to a range of stakeholders in the industry.

The hopeful idealist

Hugh Sinclair writes about his personal experiences working with both Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) and microfinance funds. He started his microfinance career as a hopeful idealist, believing that microfinance was how the poor would be launched out of poverty. As time went by, however, the book explains how he lost faith in what he saw as an industry that had been taken over by greed. This lead to exploitation of the poor through exorbitant interest rates and unfair loan terms. According to Sinclair, microfinance has gone from being the emancipator of the poorest, to a tool for exploitation of the weakest. In the book he tries to explain the main problems with the industry as he sees it and what can be done about them, because he still believes that microfinance has the potential to relieve people from poverty.

The middlemen are the bad guys

Starting with his main critique of the sector, he claims that the main problem with microfinance does not lie in either its basic idea, the capital providers (MFIs) nor the poor; instead it lies with the intermediaries. The intermediaries are the funds who pool money bound for microcredit, and those they invest their capital in are the MFIs. He claims that these players have become driven by making a profit rather than achieving social impact. This has led to MFIs offering loans with unfair terms and without collateral or proper screening. The reason for this is basically that the more loans they distribute, the more money they make. The incentive scheme becomes a recipe for failure and irresponsible microlending.

Fumbling in the dark

Next in line for criticism are the microfinance funds, such as Blue Orchard and responsAbility, where Sinclair also places P2P lending services. These institutions want to lend as much as possible of their client’s money to the MFIs to maximize their own profits, and are thus blind to the poor ratings and warning signs they receive about the MFIs they invest in. Sinclair claims that they keep their investors in the dark as long as possible concerning the interest rates the end-user is charged, all to keep up the facade of offering social impact loans while maximizing their own profits. Microfinance has simply become a way for people looking for an easy buck to trick well-intended investors to invest their money in high risk loans, while collecting usurious interest rates.

There is still hope

Nevertheless, Sinclair has not written a book that is without hope. He does believe in the idea of microfinance, his claim is simply that to a large extent it has not been executed properly. He mentions a number of MFIs, funds, and P2P-lending sites that do have good practices. He ends his book with a number of concrete advice to the different actors in the sector – investors, funds, MFIs, regulators and borrowers. In short, he recommends stricter regulation, increased transparency regarding interest rates and loans terms, and finally always keeping in mind the importance of having social impact at the top of the priority list.

The risk of misreading conclusions

When Sinclair wrote this book, I imagine that he was frustrated with what he saw as an industry with the potential to seriously achieve change being used in all the wrong ways. He therefore wanted to change this industry by writing a book which enlightens the general public, who in turn might put pressure on the major microfinance funds and MFIs to change their practices. However, in making this book available to a wider audience, he simplifies, and when he simplifies, people make simplified conclusions. Thus a likely result of this book is that some people might use his personal experiences to dismiss the whole idea of microfinance, even though his book revolves around his personal experiences working with microcredit. It’s therefore important to point out that there’s a substantial difference between drawing soft conclusions based on a case-study, and by generalizing these conclusions to the whole sector.

The lender-borrower symbiosis

Nevertheless, Sinclair does bring to light a number of very important issues to keep in mind when working with microfinance. The heart of the matter is that a good investment is good for both lender and borrower. Profiteers in the microfinance industry with little regard for the well-being and development of the borrower are shooting themselves in the foot. Their profits may come quick, but they will not be sustainable in the long run. Wise loans give a stable yield and increase the productivity and well-being of the borrower, enabling him or her to take another loan to grow further.

Weeding out the bad seeds

Whether or not to invest in microfinance opportunities is ultimately up to the sources of capital: the lenders. If lenders refuse to hand their money to microfinance funds who collaborate with irresponsible MFIs and are not honest with how much they charge, these entities will slowly but surely be excluded from the market.

Let’s weed out the bad seeds! Say no to APRs above market rates, say yes to transparency. That’s (more or less) Sinclair’s conclusion, and we can only agree to that.

Read Full Post »

What is Annual Percentage Rate (APR)? My lecturer in finance used to say:

- APR is ‘the kilo-price of borrowing money’. It’s just the same as the kilo-price you pay for apples you buy in the supermarket. It’s a measure that allows people to compare loan products including interest, all fees etc. – as opposed to only comparing the nominal interest which is insufficient and gives a skewed picture.

APR is an important tool for comparison purposes, but it should be used with respect. What APR can do is to compare the rates from one loan provider to another; how the rates vary over time; how they vary from country to country in a specific region and so on, always keeping in mind which exogenous factors might be the reason why some APRs have to be higher than others, such as financial instability in a country. Of course the cost of borrowing (the APR) will be higher in Malawi where its Kwacha currency was recently devalued by about 50% than it will be in the Euro-zone. It’s risk vs. rates, as in any other investment situation.

So let’s have a look at the realised MYC4 APR for the last couple of years:

What’s shown in the chart above is a small dot for every loan on MYC4 for the last 3 years based on loan size. As you can see, most loans have had an APR of 40-65%. Now, what can we compare this to? We can compare it to any other microfinance institution in the same area at the same time. For that purpose we have the organisation MF Transparency which collects data on APR. Here’s their data for Kenya for instance. Please, feel free to compare with MYC4 and post a comment with your findings. Also, below you can see the APR over time for the countries MYC4 has (and have had) operations in:

But understand one immensely important point: APR should not be used to compare different financial products in different financial markets. Comparing the APR on your Danish mortgage loan with a small business loan in Uganda is nonsense. It’s not what the APR should be used for. You can compare APR within a sector/country/loan product/period of time, but that’s about it. You wouldn’t compare the kilo-price on bananas and apples and demand it’ll be the same either, would you? You wouldn’t demand that a banana should cost exactly the same in every country either, right?

For more details on APR, see the blogpost Highlighting APR by MYC4 Credit Operations Manager, Titus Kuria.

Read Full Post »

When you open any loan on MYC4, on the first page, you will find an item called total cost for business (APR). Ever wondered what that means, is it the same as interest rate, why MYC4 prefers using it, why it seems to differ across countries, its limitations, and/ or any other question? This blog post seeks to help on this, and highlight this measure of cost.

APR in full refers to Annual Percentage Rate. It is one among many measures of the cost of a loan, which include interest rate, total cost of capital etc. APR is quite often confused with interest rate, or mistaken to be the same. The two are quite different. For example on this loan for Grace Waruguru Mwangi, the APR is 54.23%, but the interest rate is 33.83%.

APR as a measure of cost ideally takes into account all costs of a loan including interest, insurance fees, legal fees, processing/ closing fees, forced savings, and any other fees paid upfront on a loan: It then expresses all these costs as a single annual rate. The APR computation assumes that all these costs run across the life of the loan, and thus spreads the costs across the entire loan term (thus the longer the loan period, the lower the APR). In the absence of upfront fees, the APR value would equal the interest rate value.

APR’s usefulness is that it offers a level playing ground for comparing loan pricing by different players. It basically helps us compare apples to apples when it comes to pricing. Microfinance institutions, during product design and marketing, usually vary the various items of costs so as to appeal to a target market; emphasizing strongly on the item of cost that could interest the target borrower more. For example one MFI might offer a one year loan at 16% interest rate plus 3% processing fee; and another offers 18% interest rate plus 2% processing fee; APR will help evaluate which of the two is a cheaper loan. In this example, the loan with 18% interest is a cheaper/ better loan than the one with 16% as it has a lower APR.

Titus Kuria, MYC4's Credit Operations Manager, in a meeting

MYC4 endeavors to promote and ensure transparency in the cost of borrowing. The end beneficiary of transparency in costs is ultimately the borrower. On each loan on MYC4 in the “Costs for Business” segment, we give both APR and an indicative guideline of the total cost in absolute amounts that a borrower will pay. Many financial institutions have been known to lower their interest as a result of disclosure requirements. The financial industry has historically been held in suspicion by consumers due to the many hidden charges associated with their transactions. Many borrowers have suffered from costs that are revealed after signing the loan contract (essentially after buying the goods). To counteract this some countries have resorted to legislate how cost of borrowing is revealed to borrowers; established regimes such as those in the US, UK, Canada and the EU all use the APR measure. The use of APR in Africa is not widespread, but there is concerted effort to ensure its legislated use.

The APR levels on loans on MYC4 differ from loan to loan but vary within a reasonable range.  The APRs on MYC4 loans are very competitive in the microfinance industry across all countries we operate in. Ghana is currently the country with the highest APR on MYC4 platform; however, their APR is competitive in the Ghanaian market even compared to banks (who rely on cheap customer deposits to lend). We have numerous instances where borrowers prefer to wait longer (bidding period) for a MYC4 loan than get a provider’s other loan products immediately. MYC4 does not seek to undercut the markets on cost, but focuses on providing fair priced loans to marginalized segments and SMEs.

Read Full Post »

Yesterday evening Danish national Television picked up on the Norwegian program and broad casted it in prime time News – watch it here (only in Danish).

Ole Dahl Rasmussen, Advisor in Danish Church Aid who works with Microfinance, mentions that he is aware of players in the industry that creates challenges like the ones mentioned in the Norwegian program, but it is only a few players he knows of.

Ole explained that Danish Church Aid charges 5% in interest per month on their microloan in Africa – it was not mentioned whether this is as a ‘flat fee’ or on a ‘declining balance’ or whether there are additional fees attached to the loan, so I cannot calculate the APR that they offer their loans at. This said, I am VERY positive that he, representing a leading NGO, leads by example and opens up the debate about how costly it is to lend money to micro- and small scale businesses in Africa (I don’t have the experience with other parts of the developing world, but I guess it is more or less the same)…

You simply cannot compare lending money in Africa (with incomplete financial markets) with lending money in Denmark. Though, some time ago in Denmark, microloans via your mobile phone was introduced and when you read the terms and conditions with tiny tiny letters, which you by law must include in adds like this in Denmark, you could see that APR was between 2,000% and 3,000%!! Just sending in the application had a price tag of around EUR 4… so actually, you CAN compare lending money in the two markets and I am not in doubt where I would borrow the money looking at this ‘example’.

Let me introduce you to an organization we really like to see succeed in the developing world: MF Transparency – they are set in the world to help you calculate and understand interest rates, APRs, and the correlation of operating costs and loan size – and best of all: they are making this information transparent, so players in the industry can’t hide!

‘Our Mission is to be the venue for the microfinance industry to publicly demonstrate its commitment to pricing transparency, integrity and poverty alleviation.

Our Vision is a microfinance industry operating with healthy free market conditions where consumers and other stakeholders can make informed decisions.’

The interest rate debate is important, for sure, BUT let me highlight THE single most important aspect of lending/borrowing capital as we see it: the ability to repay – as I also wrote about in the post yesterday.

Have a great day,

Tim

P.S. It was mentioned that the Norwegian program will be sent on Danish national Television in January next year.

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 107 other followers

%d bloggers like this: